It is a civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff The cash advance shop of Wisconsin contends that defendant City of Madison has enacted an ordinance that violates plaintiff’s liberties to equal security and due procedure and it is unconstitutionally obscure. In addition, plaintiff contends that the ordinance is preempted by state legislation.
Whenever plaintiff filed its issue, it desired an initial injunction to stop defendant from enforcing the ordinance that is allegedly unconstitutional.
Defendant reacted to your motion and presented a movement for summary judgment at the exact same time, asserting that the cartitleloansplus.com/ appropriate axioms determining the motions had been similar. Defendant asked that its movement for summary judgment be addressed without enabling plaintiff time for finding, arguing that any finding will be unneeded. Læs videre Pay day loan shop of Wisconsin v. City of Madison, 333 F. Supp. 2d 800 (W.D. Wis. 2004)